version 1.53, 2002/09/09 14:04:02
|
version 1.56, 2003/07/25 17:07:06
|
Line 39 lonsql - LON TCP-MySQL-Server Daemon for
|
Line 39 lonsql - LON TCP-MySQL-Server Daemon for
|
This script should be run as user=www. |
This script should be run as user=www. |
Note that a lonsql.pid file contains the pid of the parent process. |
Note that a lonsql.pid file contains the pid of the parent process. |
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION |
=head1 OVERVIEW |
|
|
lonsql is many things to many people. To me, it is a source file in need |
The SQL database in LON-CAPA is used for catalog searches against |
of documentation. |
resource metadata only. The authoritative version of the resource |
|
metadata is an XML-file on the normal file system (same file name as |
|
resource plus ".meta"). The SQL-database is a cache of these files, |
|
and can be reconstructed from the XML files at any time. |
|
|
|
The current database is implemented assuming a non-adjustable |
|
architecture involving these data fields (specific to each version of |
|
a resource). |
|
|
|
=over 4 |
|
|
|
=item * title |
|
|
|
=item * author |
|
|
|
=item * subject |
|
|
|
=item * notes |
|
|
|
=item * abstract |
|
|
|
=item * mime |
|
|
|
=item * language |
|
|
|
=item * creationdate |
|
|
|
=item * lastrevisiondate |
|
|
|
=item * owner |
|
|
|
=item * copyright |
|
|
|
=back |
|
|
|
=head2 Purpose within LON-CAPA |
|
|
|
LON-CAPA is meant to distribute A LOT of educational content to A LOT |
|
of people. It is ineffective to directly rely on contents within the |
|
ext2 filesystem to be speedily scanned for on-the-fly searches of |
|
content descriptions. (Simply put, it takes a cumbersome amount of |
|
time to open, read, analyze, and close thousands of files.) |
|
|
|
The solution is to index various data fields that are descriptive of |
|
the educational resources on a LON-CAPA server machine in a |
|
database. Descriptive data fields are referred to as "metadata". The |
|
question then arises as to how this metadata is handled in terms of |
|
the rest of the LON-CAPA network without burdening client and daemon |
|
processes. |
|
|
|
The obvious solution, using lonc to send a query to a lond process, |
|
doesn't work so well in general as you can see in the following |
|
example: |
|
|
|
lonc= loncapa client process A-lonc= a lonc process on Server A |
|
lond= loncapa daemon process |
|
|
|
database command |
|
A-lonc --------TCP/IP----------------> B-lond |
|
|
|
The problem emerges that A-lonc and B-lond are kept waiting for the |
|
MySQL server to "do its stuff", or in other words, perform the |
|
conceivably sophisticated, data-intensive, time-sucking database |
|
transaction. By tying up a lonc and lond process, this significantly |
|
cripples the capabilities of LON-CAPA servers. |
|
|
|
The solution is to offload the work onto another process, and use |
|
lonc and lond just for requests and notifications of completed |
|
processing: |
|
|
|
database command |
|
|
|
A-lonc ---------TCP/IP-----------------> B-lond =====> B-lonsql |
|
<---------------------------------/ | |
|
"ok, I'll get back to you..." | |
|
| |
|
/ |
|
A-lond <------------------------------- B-lonc <====== |
|
"Guess what? I have the result!" |
|
|
|
Of course, depending on success or failure, the messages may vary, but |
|
the principle remains the same where a separate pool of children |
|
processes (lonsql's) handle the MySQL database manipulations. |
|
|
|
Thus, lonc and lond spend effectively no time waiting on results from |
|
the database. |
|
|
=head1 Internals |
=head1 Internals |
|
|